From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1993
199 A.D.2d 261 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 6, 1993

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.).


Ordered that the decree and resettled decree are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the estate.

We find that the Surrogate's Court did not err in finding that the first attorney to handle the estate, the late Raphael L. Elias, did not agree to provide services without compensation. In addition, the record supports the court's determination that the firm of Shapiro Schwartz, the successor firm, was retained by the estate, was not discharged by the letter from the executrix dated March 22, 1988, and was entitled to compensation for the services provided. Accordingly, the Surrogate's Court did not err in awarding compensation to the Estate of Raphael L. Elias, and to the firm of Shapiro Schwartz pursuant to SCPA 2110.

We decline to award sanctions in connection with the instant appeal. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Balletta and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Barson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1993
199 A.D.2d 261 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Barson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of GEORGE D. BARSON, Deceased. MARGARET E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 261 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 947