From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barquet v. Rojas-Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1995
216 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 19, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the cross motion is denied.

Inasmuch as the Law Guardian failed to serve the appellant with a notice of cross motion (see, CPLR 2215) demanding the imposition of financial sanctions pursuant to 22 N.Y.CRR part 130, the Family Court erred in providing for such relief in the order appealed from (see, Tulchin Assocs. v. Vignola, 186 A.D.2d 183, 186; Cannizzaro v. Cannizzaro, 186 A.D.2d 776, 778; Saba v. Utica Fire Ins. Co., 176 A.D.2d 1212; Marsico v. Southland Corp., 148 A.D.2d 503, 506; Vanek v. Mercy Hosp., 135 A.D.2d 707). Pizzuto, J.P., Hart, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Barquet v. Rojas-Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1995
216 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Barquet v. Rojas-Castillo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE BARQUET, Respondent, v. LIANA ROJAS-CASTILLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

Thomas v. the Drifters, Inc.

Since The Drifters, Inc., failed to serve the plaintiffs with a notice of cross motion (see, CPLR 2215), it…

Nassau Point Lagoon, Inc. v. Burrell

The Second Department has clearly stated that: Since [defendant] failed to serve the plaintiffs with a notice…