From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barner v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 9, 1998
252 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 9, 1998


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit prisoners from possessing weapons and contraband. The misbehavior report stated that a correction officer searched petitioner's cell and found a wooden awl with a steel point 5 1/2 inches long under petitioner's mattress. The misbehavior report, which was signed by the two correction officers who witnessed the incident and described in detail the appearance of the weapon, the time and date of the incident and the location where the weapon was found, constituted substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Barranco v. Coughlin, 222 A.D.2d 904; Matter of Rouse v. Coughlin, 219 A.D.2d 858, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 806).

Furthermore, assuming without deciding that petitioner's contentions of procedural error are preserved for our review, we would find them to be lacking in merit. The only question that petitioner asked his employee assistant was answered. He waived his right to call any witnesses and never complained that his assistant was inadequate. Even if petitioner asked for documentation as to whether the search of his cell was authorized and his assistant failed to retrieve this documentation, such failure would be irrelevant to the issue of whether petitioner was in possession of contraband ( see, Matter of Di Rose v. Coombe, 233 A.D.2d 799, 800; Matter of Sweeter v. Coughlin, 221 A.D.2d 741; Matter of Tankleff v. Coughlin, 210 A.D.2d 815). The record also establishes that petitioner was in the gymnasium when the search was conducted and, because he was not removed from his cell, his presence during the search was not required ( see, Matter of Perez v. Coombe, 232 A.D.2d 702; Matter of Scott v. Coughlin, 231 A.D.2d 727). Finally, the record is absent of any indication that the Hearing Officer was biased ( see, Matter of Spencer v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 827, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 811).

Having reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, we find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Barner v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 9, 1998
252 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Barner v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEROME BARNER, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 803

Citing Cases

Perkins v. Goord

We perceive no basis upon which to disturb the Hearing Officer's resolution of the credibility issue created…

Matter of Williams v. Selsky

Turning to petitioner's procedural arguments, we reject the contention that petitioner was denied documentary…