From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barber v. Lomenzo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1965
212 N.E.2d 769 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1965

Decided October 26, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, ELLIS J. STALEY, JR., J.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Herbert H. Smith and Ruth K. Toch of counsel), for appellant.

Michael J. Sullivan for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs. Within the intent of the Election Law sections, the Appellate Division's decision is correct. We need not pass on any constitutional question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term.


Summaries of

Matter of Barber v. Lomenzo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1965
212 N.E.2d 769 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Barber v. Lomenzo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THEODORE W. BARBER, Respondent, v. JOHN P. LOMENZO, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 26, 1965

Citations

212 N.E.2d 769 (N.Y. 1965)
212 N.E.2d 769
265 N.Y.S.2d 282

Citing Cases

Wein v. Thomas

CPLR 2103 (subd [a]) provides that "Except where otherwise prescribed by law or order of court, papers may be…

Matter of Periconi v. Lomenzo

The number of signatures required is 1,500. (See Matter of Barber v. Lomenzo, 24 A.D.2d 43, affd. 16 N.Y.2d…