From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 15, 1994

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


In our view, the evidence in the record concerning the circumstances and timing of claimant's attempt to appeal from an adverse ruling of the Administrative Law Judge supplied a rational basis for the Board's finding of untimeliness. The Board did not exceed its powers by failing to credit claimant's explanation for the delay. In light of the explicit provisions of Labor Law § 621 (1) regarding the timeliness of appeals, we find no reason to disturb the Board's determination.

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Barago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Barago

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES J. BARAGO, Appellant. JOHN F. HUDACS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 15, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 264

Citing Cases

Matter of Kilgore

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant failed to appeal the decision of an…

In re Banks

Nearly two years later, claimant sought to appeal the ALJ's decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal…