From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bandman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 5, 1997
240 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 5, 1997

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant continued to work a nine-hour-a-week part-time job after his full-time employment ended under nondisqualifying circumstances. He received unemployment insurance benefits which reflected a reduced benefit rate due to his continued part-time employment. Claiming that the part-time job was causing stress and interfering with his ability to find full-time employment, claimant quit his part-time job. Thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he left his part-time employment without good cause and assessed him a recoverable overpayment of $975. Under the circumstances, we conclude that the Board's finding that claimant left his employment for personal and noncompelling reasons is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Pierce [Hudacs], 210 A.D.2d 727; Matter of Grandy [Phillips — Ross], 64 A.D.2d 796) and that the recoverable overpayment was properly assessed (see, Labor Law § 597).

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Bandman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 5, 1997
240 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Bandman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MURRAY BANDMAN, Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Jeffries

Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. A claimant who resigns from employment while continuing…