From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Banagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 7, 2000
271 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

imposing two-year suspension, based on: neglect of two criminal appeals; failure to cooperate with disciplinary committee; and prior disciplinary record

Summary of this case from In re Aranda

Opinion

April 7, 2000.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1974 and maintains a law office in Albany.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

James E. Banagan, Albany, respondent in person.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, PETERS, CARPINELLO, and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


It is undisputed that, from about 1995 through 1999, respondent neglected two criminal appeals in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and ignored letters, telephone calls and orders from the Federal court urging his prosecution of the appeals. In 1997, the court sanctioned him $2,500 for neglect of the first appeal, which he failed to pay. In 1999, his continuing misconduct resulted in a total fine of $4,000 and a suspension from practice for a period of 1 1/2 years (Matter of Banagan, 186 F.3d 143). He has paid the fine. Respondent's neglect and failure to comply with directives of the Federal appeals court violated this court's disciplinary rules, as charged in the petition (see, 22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5]; 1200.30 [a] [3]; 1200.32 [a] [2], [3]). Respondent also failed to fully cooperate with petitioner's investigation (see, 22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5], [7]). Respondent's misconduct is aggravated by his disciplinary record, which since 1985 includes two cautions and two admonishments issued by petitioner and a 1998 censure by this court (Matter of Banagan, 254 A.D.2d 622).

Under the circumstances presented, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from practice for a period of two years.

ORDERED that respondent is found guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in the petition; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from practice for a period of two years, effective 20 days from the date of this order, and until further order of this court; and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this court's rules ( 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys.


Summaries of

Matter of Banagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 7, 2000
271 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

imposing two-year suspension, based on: neglect of two criminal appeals; failure to cooperate with disciplinary committee; and prior disciplinary record

Summary of this case from In re Aranda
Case details for

Matter of Banagan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES E. BANAGAN, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 7, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 486

Citing Cases

Matter of Flannery

In June 1999, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision sanctioning four attorneys for neglect of…

Matter of Banagan

Decided and Entered: June 17, 2003. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1974 and maintained…