From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1900
54 App. Div. 21 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

September Term, 1900.

Willard Robinson and Edgar Hull, for the appellants.

John B. Conway and Fred A. Bratt, for the respondents.


We think that the County Court properly denied the application. If the appeal has not removed the matter beyond the jurisdiction of the County Court it is still an appeal from the judgment of the County Court based upon the report of the commissioners and the evidence before the court as returned by the commissioners. To make a different record, with different facts for this court, is not permissible. That would not in any sense be reviewing the County Court. The record which comes here must be the exact case considered by the County Court.

The order of the County Court is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Matter of Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1900
54 App. Div. 21 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Matter of Baker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of SAMUEL D. BAKER and WILLIAM E. DOIG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1900

Citations

54 App. Div. 21 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
66 N.Y.S. 242