From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bajrami v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1994
206 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the order dated July 29, 1993, is reversed, on the law, the motion to renew is granted, upon renewal, the order entered January 15, 1993, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for further proceedings consistent herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered January 15, 1993, is dismissed as academic, in light of our determination on the appeal from the order dated July 29, 1993; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

Pjeter Bajrami (hereinafter the insured) commenced a proceeding to compel arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, claiming that he was injured in an accident which allegedly was caused by debris which fell from the back of an unidentified dump truck traveling on Route 440 in Staten Island. General Accident Insurance Company (hereinafter General) commenced a cross proceeding to stay arbitration on the ground, inter alia, that there was conflicting evidence regarding whether the accident was caused by debris which actually fell from the dump truck and actually came into physical contact with the vehicle which collided with the insured's automobile. The Supreme Court granted the insured's petition, denied General's cross petition, and directed that the matter proceed to arbitration. General thereafter moved to renew, submitting additional new evidence suggesting that the requisite physical contact between the dump truck and the vehicle which struck the insured's automobile was lacking. The Supreme Court denied the motion.

We find that a preliminary factual question exists regarding whether the vehicle which struck the insured's automobile was itself struck by debris from the dump truck. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court for a hearing and determination of that issue. Should the court determine that contact did occur and in fact caused the collision, the court should then determine whether that contact satisfies the requirements of "physical contact" for the purpose of uninsured motorist coverage in accordance with the principles set forth in Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Killakey ( 78 N.Y.2d 325, 327). Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Bajrami v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1994
206 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Bajrami v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PJETER BAJRAMI, Respondent, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Beddini

In Bajrami, the claimant sought to compel arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim relating to injuries he…

EAN Holdings, LLC v. Joseph

The Petitioner correctly cites a number of cases following Killakey that support this Court's conclusion.…