From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1944
59 N.E.2d 439 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1944

Decided November 22, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

George J. Stacy and William S. Sinclair for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

William B. Davis and E.C. Sherwood for F.W. Woolworth Company and The Travelers Insurance Company, respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1944
59 N.E.2d 439 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Claim of Bach v. Hampden Sales Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRANCES M. BACH, Respondent, against HAMPDEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1944

Citations

59 N.E.2d 439 (N.Y. 1944)
59 N.E.2d 439

Citing Cases

Matter of H v. G P Con. Co.

The testimony that appellant was formed to handle New York jobs, the existence of a New York office, and the…

Skakandy v. State of New York

As between workman and employer the remedies provided by the Workmen's Compensation Law are exclusive. (…