From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Baby Boy P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2001
287 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued September 17, 2001.

October 1, 2001.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated March 17, 1999, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated November 19, 1998, made after a hearing, finding, inter alia, that she had neglected the subject child, and, upon her default in appearing at the dispositional hearing, placed the child in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months, and (2) an order of the same court, dated May 6, 1999, which denied her motion to vacate the March 17, 1999, order.

Matthew M. Lupoli, Flushing, N.Y., for appellant. Robert S. Modena, Bayside, N.Y., Law Guardian for the child.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated March 17, 1999, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated May 6, 1999, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court properly denied her motion to vacate the order dated March 17, 1999, entered upon her default in appearing at the dispositional hearing. The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense to the proceeding. In her motion to vacate the order dated March 17, 1999, the appellant merely advised the court that she had been suffering from herpes and submitted a doctor's note to that effect. Moreover, the appellant failed to submit an affidavit of merit. As a result, the Family Court correctly concluded that the appellant "willfully refused to appear at the hearing" (Family Ct Act — 1042; see, Matter of Irvin R., 257 A.D.2d 624; Matter of Cassandra M., 260 A.D.2d 962).

The Family Court's finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Denise J., 87 N.Y.2d 73).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Baby Boy P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2001
287 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Baby Boy P

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF BABY BOY P. (ANONYMOUS). COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Levonn G

Ordered that the order dated August 16, 2004, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the…

In the Matter of Joseph C

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the…