From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Aurelio v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1943
51 N.E.2d 930 (N.Y. 1943)

Opinion

Argued September 27, 1943

Decided September 27, 1943

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DINEEN, J.

Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel ( Paxton Blair and James Hall Prothero of counsel), for Board of Elections of the City of New York, appellants.

Charles H. Tuttle for George Frankenthaler, appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz and Alfred J. Bohlinger for Thomas J. Curran et al., appellants.

Andrew M. Lawler and Harold P. Spivak for the Democratic Party, appellant.

Leo J. Rosett and Harold P. Spivak for Matthew M. Levy, appellant.

Robert H. Elder and Otho S. Bowling for Thomas A. Aurelio, respondent.

Anthony J. Graziano for William Lauricella et al., objectants, respondents.


Orders affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Aurelio v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1943
51 N.E.2d 930 (N.Y. 1943)
Case details for

Matter of Aurelio v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS A. AURELIO, Respondent, against S. HOWARD COHEN et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 27, 1943

Citations

51 N.E.2d 930 (N.Y. 1943)
51 N.E.2d 930

Citing Cases

Matter of Van Etten v. Millspaugh

(It was also alleged that a ninth person was not entitled to vote by reason of not being a citizen but it was…

Matter of Southard v. McGann

"The field of its powers is limited to the specified matters; within that field the power is plenary." (…