From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Augustine v. Erie County Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 4, 1998

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of respondent's cross motion seeking to dismiss the petition brought by the school district petitioners. In light of the court's determination that this CPLR article 78 proceeding is premature because respondent has not rendered a final determination on the reconveyance issue, with which we agree, the court lacks jurisdiction over the matter ( see, CPLR 7801; Matter of Lapiana v. Gliedman, 108 A.D.2d 857, 858). Hence, the court erred in retaining jurisdiction over the proceeding and directing respondent to hear and determine the application of the school district petitioners. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J. — CPLR art 78.)


Summaries of

Augustine v. Erie County Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Augustine v. Erie County Industrial Development Agency

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD AUGUSTINE et al., Respondents, v. ERIE COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 516