From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Astor

Surrogate's Court, Dutchess County
Jun 15, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 401 (N.Y. Misc. 1959)

Opinion

June 15, 1959

Harry H. Lipsig ( Leonard Bernstein, Paul Rosen and Ivan M. Dochter of counsel), for John J. Astor.

Carter, Ledyard Milburn ( William S. Gaud, John L. Palisi and James C. Peterson of counsel), for Allan W. Betts and another, as temporary administrators of the estate of Vincent Astor, deceased.

Alexander C. Dow for Max Perl, as general guardian of Emily Harding.


Application has been made to this court by Harry H. Lipsig, Esq., attorney for John Jacob Astor, for an order (1) Reopening the preliminary examination of witnesses to the purported will, and (2) Permitting a broader examination of such subscribing witnesses, and (3) Overruling objections to questions heretofore asked and (4) For such other and further and different relief as to the court may seem just and proper.

The temporary administrators oppose the application on the grounds that the attorneys for John Jacob Astor have had a full and adequate examination of the three witnesses to the will pursuant to section 141 of the Surrogate's Court Act, covering seven court days and 962 pages of testimony.

After hearing Harry H. Lipsig, Esq., on behalf of the motion, and William S. Gaud, Esq., in opposition thereto, and after reading the affidavits and memoranda submitted on behalf of the respective parties, the court decides and finds as follows:

Request to reopen the preliminary examination of the witnesses should be denied, as well as all other relief sought by the petitioner on this motion.

Submit decree accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Astor

Surrogate's Court, Dutchess County
Jun 15, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 401 (N.Y. Misc. 1959)
Case details for

Matter of Astor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of VINCENT ASTOR, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court, Dutchess County

Date published: Jun 15, 1959

Citations

18 Misc. 2d 401 (N.Y. Misc. 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 387

Citing Cases

Matter of Hutton

While the court in the Beeman case did say that an examination under section 141 should be liberally…