Submitted March 4, 1991
Decided April 30, 1991
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court's February 9, 1990 order, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY ASARO et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 30, 1991
Even arguendo, that this Court deems Plaintiff's Cross-Motion a renewal of her original application made by…
People v. Backus. "Absent a specific statute granting the People the right to appeal, ... this Court is without jurisdiction…