From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Arzillo v. Parry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1975
49 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

October 6, 1975


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to review two determinations of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, each dated October 24, 1974, which, after statutory fair hearings, affirmed separate orders of the Commissioner of the Orange County Department of Social Services which directed reductions in certain grants of public assistance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered April 29, 1975, which, inter alia, (1) adjudged this a proper class action, (2) annulled the determinations under review and (3) remanded the matter to the State Commissioner for further proceedings. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the first decretal paragraph and substituting therefor a provision to the effect that this proceeding may not be maintained as a class action. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. The determinations were rendered in the absence of findings of willfulness and undue hardship, contrary to the applicable paragraphs of 18 NYCRR 352.31 (d). Although we hold that this is not a proper case for a class action (see Matter of Scarpelli v Lavine, 48 A.D.2d 899; Matter of Mann v Lavine, 49 A.D.2d 879), we nevertheless affirm the remand for further proceedings. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Arzillo v. Parry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1975
49 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Arzillo v. Parry

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELAINE ARZILLO et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Matter of Catoe v. Lavine

" Because of the impending birth of their children, petitioners did not avail themselves of their right to a…