Opinion
February 26, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.).
Petitioner's contention that it was arbitrary and capricious for the agency to apply pre-April 1, 1984 law to the determination of this matter is foreclosed by this Court's decisions in Matter of Lavanant v State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal ( 148 A.D.2d 185) and Matter of Jemrock Realty Co. v Division of Hous. Community Renewal ( 166 A.D.2d 222). We have reviewed petitioner's other arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.