From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Arbor Oaks Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

August 12, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In the light of the prior history of this property, prior reviews and decisions by the Zoning Board of Appeals in 1960 and 1975, the evidence adduced at the hearing on the present application (including evidence necessitated by the applicant's concern that the permit and variances granted by the board in 1975 may have lapsed from nonuse), we find no basis in this record for annulling or modifying the determination as amended under review which granted the application in issue ( cf. Matter of Cowan v. Kern, 41 N.Y.2d 591). On all of the evidence, the determination under review cannot be held to be arbitrary, capricious or illegal, as contended by appellant. Appellant's further contention that it was denied a fair hearing and a reasonable opportunity to present evidence is without merit. Appellant's final argument, noncompliance with the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL article 8), was neither raised in the administrative proceedings nor in appellant's CPLR article 78 petition, supporting affirmation and initial brief. It was belatedly raised for the first time in a later brief before Special Term. Under all the circumstances, the question was not properly preserved for review. Gibbons, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Arbor Oaks Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Arbor Oaks Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Bd.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARBOR OAKS CIVIC ASSOCIATION OF DIX HILL, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 12, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Waddle v. E.G. Snyder Company, Inc.

We find that the plaintiffs never relied at the trial on any violation of the New York Labor Law. In fact the…

Matter of Henry Quentzel Plumbing v. Quentzel

Accordingly, we find that the Supreme Court properly confirmed the award. As the other issues raised by the…