From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Antonio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1995
214 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 3, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.).


Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's contention that the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing was insufficient to require him to pay restitution in the amount of $1,500 is without merit. We find that the court's determination was fully supported by the victim's testimony at the dispositional hearing with respect to his losses as a result of the appellant's acts. Moreover, the court's determination with regard to the amount of restitution was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Matter of James A., 205 A.D.2d 621; Matter of Kerry E., 161 A.D.2d 843; cf., Matter of Richard GG., 187 A.D.2d 846; Matter of David N., 97 A.D.2d 980).

We find the appellant's remaining contention to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Antonio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1995
214 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Antonio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTONIO M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

Mtr. of J.S

In the sparse case law which this court has found, the hearing at the dispositional phase is one to which the…

Joshua R.S. v. Steuben Cnty. Law Dep't

Furthermore, the victim testified to the model and the condition of his stolen handgun and that he had…