From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Angyal v. Ambach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1984
105 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 21, 1984


Petitioner does not dispute the fact that she was found in violation of article 33 of the Public Health Law. She admitted by stipulation to improperly dispensing controlled substances for use by herself for back pains and by her boyfriend to suppress appetite and control obesity. Petitioner seeks in this proceeding a stay of the remaining one-month suspension of license imposed upon her.

Our power to review administrative action is limited. The test as set out in Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. ( 34 N.Y.2d 222) is whether the punishment is so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. The instant misconduct is serious in nature and we see no reason to disturb the punishment imposed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Main, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Angyal v. Ambach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1984
105 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Angyal v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GAIL ANGYAL, Petitioner, v. GORDON M. AMBACH, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Matter of National Tractor v. Commr. of N.Y

We further conclude that the fact that petitioner paid the civil penalty before the amended order was issued…