From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Andy B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1994
205 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 14, 1994

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Bruce Kaplan, J.).


As the presentment agency concedes, on constraint of Matter of Rodney J., which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals after the instant appeal was perfected ( 194 A.D.2d 342, affd 83 N.Y.2d 503), since the laboratory report attached to the petition did not indicate that it was signed by the person who conducted the test, the petition does not contain sufficient nonhearsay allegations to make out a prima facie case that the substance tested was cocaine, and accordingly must be dismissed.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Andy B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1994
205 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

In re Andy B.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDY B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 366

Citing Cases

Matter of Kirk

The identical language has been reviewed in a number of cases and has been found insufficient in that the…