Opinion
January 29, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Inasmuch as the appellant failed to comply with the billing provisions set forth in Rules of the New York Automobile Insurance Plan § 14 (E) (2) and § 18 (2), the subsequent cancellation by the appellant was ineffective and coverage on the offending vehicle remained in effect on the day of the accident ( see, Matter of Home Indem. Co. v Scricca, 147 A.D.2d 697; Eveready Ins. v Mitchell, 133 A.D.2d 210). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.