From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Allah v. N.Y.C. H. Hosp. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1999
259 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 25, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.).


McKinney's Unconsolidated Laws of N Y § 7390 (2) (b), exempting health care personnel formerly employed by voluntary and medical school providers, the functions of which have been assumed by respondent New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), from competitive examination as a condition of becoming civil service employees with permanent competitive status within the HHC system, does not violate N Y Constitution, article V, § 6, requiring civil service appointments to be made according to merit and fitness and, as far as practicable, by competitive examination, because the Legislature has expressly determined that requiring a competitive examination as a condition of transferring the aforementioned personnel to HHC civil service employment with permanent competitive status would seriously interrupt the continuous provision of health and medical services and, accordingly, would be impracticable ( see, Matter of Wood v. Irving, 85 N.Y.2d 238, 243; McGowan v. Burstein, 71 N.Y.2d 729, 735). While agreeing with petitioners' arguments as to the validity and applicability of McKinney's Unconsolidated Laws of N Y § 7390 (2) (b), we reject their contention on the cross appeal that the seniority of personnel transferred to HHC employment from New York Medical College and Coney Island Medical Group must be preserved pursuant to Civil Service Law § 45. The applicability of Civil Service Law § 45 is conditioned upon public acquisition of a private institution or enterprise. Thus, while a less than complete acquisition may trigger the statute's applicability ( see, e.g., Matter of Mack v. Martinez, 117 A.D.2d 959, 960), where, as here, there has been no assumption of any function, but merely a transfer of employees to enable the public entity to perform functions that the private entity continues to provide subsequent to the transfer, no acquisition has occurred within the meaning of the statute and the statute is, accordingly, not applicable.

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Allah v. N.Y.C. H. Hosp. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1999
259 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Allah v. N.Y.C. H. Hosp. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RALIEK B. ALLAH et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 153

Citing Cases

Matter of Negron v. New York City Hlt. Hosp. Corp.

Decided July 6, 1999 Appeal from (1st Dept: 259 A.D.2d 409). Motion for leave to appeal granted or…

Matter of Negron v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp.

Decided May 21, 1999 Appeal from the (1st Dept: 259 A.D.2d 409). APPEALS DISMISSED PURSUANT TO RULES OF…