From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akel v. Egan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 13, 1998

Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78.

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner was originally charged by felony complaint and, after indictment, unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the indictment, alleging that he had not received proper notice of the Grand Jury presentation. Petitioner now seeks to prohibit respondents from prosecuting him on the indictment based upon the alleged defect in the Grand Jury proceeding (see, CPL 190.50 [a]). Prohibition does not lie in this instance (see, Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 570, n. 2).


Summaries of

Akel v. Egan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Akel v. Egan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD A. AKEL, Petitioner, v. DAVID D. EGAN, as Monroe…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 129