From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ahearn v. United Van Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1942
265 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 18, 1942.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The employer was engaged in the moving, storage and trucking business and claimant was employed as a helper in loading the trucks. The principal office of the employer is in Cleveland, Ohio. On June 24, 1941, while engaged in his regular occupation and moving a piano, claimant was injured. No issue was raised as to the cause of the injury or the extent thereof, or the correctness of the award. The employer contends that it was engaged in interstate commerce and that consequently the State Industrial Board has no jurisdiction over it. The employer is a carrier by truck and not a railroad carrier and consequently the State Industrial Board had jurisdiction to make the award. The employer also makes the contention that the notice of the hearing was defective. The Board found that the employer has a branch office in the city of New York and that proper notice was mailed to it at that place. The evidence sustains the determination of the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Ahearn v. United Van Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1942
265 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Ahearn v. United Van Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of THOMAS AHEARN, Respondent, against UNITED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Matter of Etters v. Trailways of New England, Inc.

The employer was not a railroad carrier and Congress has made no provision for a method of compensation for…

Commissioners of St. Ins. Fund v. N.Y. Cent. RD

Order appealed from affirmed, with $25 costs. ( Matter of Etters v. Trailways of New England, 266 App. Div.…