From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Adoption of Gaskins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 12, 1975
318 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-94.

September 12, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frederick Pfeiffer, J.

Michael Sigman, Orlando, for appellant.

Roy A. Jones, Whitfield, Wright, Leonhardt Trickel, Orlando, for appellee.


The decree of the lower court granting a petition for adoption finding that such adoption is in the best interest of the child arrives at the appellate level with a presumption of correctness; absent a showing of a lack of competent substantial evidence to support the decree, the decision will not be reversed. Smith v. Lyst, Fla. App. 1968, 212 So.2d 921. It is impossible for this court to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion because of the absence of a transcript of testimony upon which the trial court findings were based. Royal Flair, Inc. v. Cape Coral Bank, Fla.App. 1971, 251 So.2d 895. Accordingly, by reason of the foregoing the final judgment of adoption is affirmed.

Additionally, the trial court's order of December 12, 1974, containing certain detailed findings has not been included in the record on appeal.

Affirmed.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Adoption of Gaskins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 12, 1975
318 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Adoption of Gaskins

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF TAMARA GALL GASKINS

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 12, 1975

Citations

318 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Ramey v. Thomas

Because there is substantial evidence in the record to support the trial judge's findings, we have no choice…

Mack v. Hoffman

Per Curiam. Affirmed . In re Adoption of Gaskins , 318 So. 2d 165, 165 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975) ("It is impossible…