Opinion
March, 1932.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
The frank admissions of respondent, his apparent contrition, his prompt steps leading to full restitution, his good reputation in the community where he lives and practices and other attendant circumstances lead the court to believe that in this case a censure will be sufficient. Respondent is, therefore, censured.