From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Acosta v. Previte

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 720 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued April 1, 1976

Decided April 2, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARTIN B. STECHER, J.

Philip Zichello and Stanley E. Michels for appellants.

Kenneth G. Schwarz for respondents.


MEMORANDUM. In the procedural posture in which this proceeding comes to us we review questions of law only (CPLR 5501, subd [b]). Petitioners did not sustain their burden of proving the invalidity of the petition, either by proof of permeating fraud or of such other irregularities as to nullify it. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Acosta v. Previte

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 720 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Acosta v. Previte

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK ACOSTA et al., Appellants, v. JOSEPH J. PREVITE et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 2, 1976

Citations

39 N.Y.2d 720 (N.Y. 1976)
384 N.Y.S.2d 765
349 N.E.2d 865

Citing Cases

Stavisky v. Lee

"Election Law proceedings are subject to severe time constraints, and they require immediate action" (Matter…

Salka v. Magee

As for the records of the Madison County and the Oneida County Boards of Elections, Supreme Court admitted…