From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Abramovitz v. LaTorella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 2000
274 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 22, 2000

July 24, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated August 24, 1999, which summarily adjudged the petitioner guilty of criminal contempt of court and imposed a fine of $100.

Watanabe Abramovitz, LLP, New York, N.Y. (William Keith Watanabe of counsel), for petiitoner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders and Constantine A. Speres of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, ANITA R. FLORIO, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION, ORDER JUDGMENT

Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding.

ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the determination is annulled.

The respondent failed to give sufficient warning to the petitioner that his conduct was deemed to be contumacious prior to adjudicating him in contempt (see, 22 NYCRR 701.4; Matter of Godosky v. LaTorella, 258 A.D.2d 461). Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the determination should be annulled.


Summaries of

Matter of Abramovitz v. LaTorella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 2000
274 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Abramovitz v. LaTorella

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RAFAEL ABRAMOVITZ, ETC., PETITIONER, v. CHARLES A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

Brunetti v. Gary

The summary contempt adjudication was not warranted under the circumstances of this case. The petitioner's…