Opinion
September 26, 1991
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Claimant's denial of the employer's allegations that he was aware of the employer's rules concerning loans to employees and the procedure for closing out cash registers at the end of the day merely presented questions of fact and credibility for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (see, Matter of McGlynn [Levine], 52 A.D.2d 709). Given that employees who fail to adhere to company rules are subject to disqualification from receiving unemployment insurance benefits for misconduct (see, Matter of Olan [Ross], 60 A.D.2d 113), the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Nunes [Roberts], 98 A.D.2d 934). Claimant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.
Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.