From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF AARON v. TTEE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1997
240 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 23, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In the absence of a written agreement as to attorney's fees, the petitioner law firm is entitled to compensation for the services it rendered on a quantum meruit basis ( see, Jacobson v Sassower, 66 N.Y.2d 991). The determination of whether legal fees are reasonable under the circumstances is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court ( see, Matter of Freeman, 34 N.Y.2d 1, 9-10; Chernofsky DeNoyelles v. Waldman, 212 A.D.2d 566). The court's determination fixing the retaining lien and charging lien at $15,000 for legal services rendered in the absence of any written agreement is supported by the record.

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

MATTER OF AARON v. TTEE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1997
240 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

MATTER OF AARON v. TTEE

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PHILIP IRWIN AARON, P.C., Apellant, v. JOSEPH PARISI TTEE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 1013

Citing Cases

Goldenberg v. Friedman

The Supreme Court properly determined that Eisenberger, an attorney, was entitled to summary judgment on the…

Chernis v. Swarzman

Even in the absence of a written agreement as to fees, an attorney may recover compensation for services…