Opinion
September 22, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the petition which was to annul so much of the determination as found the petitioner subject to a treble damages penalty and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the petition; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the landlord's erroneous rent computations were not willful within the meaning of the Rent Stabilization Code ( 9 NYCRR 2526.1 [a] [1]; [f] [2]), and thus do not warrant treble damages ( see, Matter of Mott v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 202 A.D.2d 354; Matter of Nagobich v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 200 A.D.2d 388).
Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.