Opinion
April 3, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cromarty, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court's factual determination as to the suitability of the claimant's comparables is supported by the record and will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Phelps Dodge Indus. v Kondzielaski, 131 A.D.2d 675; Matter of Katz v Assessor of Vil./Town of Mount Kisco, 82 A.D.2d 654; see also, Matter of City of New York [Reiss], 55 N.Y.2d 885; Chalmers Sons v State of New York, 35 A.D.2d 864). Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.