From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matteo v. Matteo

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 5, 2018
243 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D18–2005

06-05-2018

Miho Shiraishi MATTEO, Petitioner, v. Jerry Peter MATTEO, Respondent.

William S. Graessle and Jonathan W. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.


William S. Graessle and Jonathan W. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is DENIED .

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matteo v. Matteo

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 5, 2018
243 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Matteo v. Matteo

Case Details

Full title:MIHO SHIRAISHI MATTEO, Petitioner, v. JERRY PETER MATTEO, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 5, 2018

Citations

243 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)