From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mattel, Inc. v. Guangzhou Huaweimian Clothing Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 1, 2022
22-cv-963 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-963 (RA)

03-01-2022

MATTEL, INC., Plaintiff v. GUANGZHOU HUAWEIMIAN CLOTHING CO., LTD. d/b/a WWW.BARBIEDOLLHOUSE.SHOP; YICHENG COUNTY TENGYI NETWORK SALES CO., LTD. d/b/a WWW.BARBIETOY.SHOP; LI HAO d/b/a WWW.BARBIETOY-USA.SHOP; YANG JUNHUI d/b/a WWW.BARBIE USA.STORE; LI HAO; YANG JUNHUI; WWW.BARBIEDOLLHOUSE.SHOP; WWW.BARBIETOY.SHOP; WWW.BARBIETOY- USA.SHOP; WWW.BARBIEUSA.SHOP and WWW.BARBIEUSA.STORE, Defendants.


PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER

CONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge

GLOSSARY

Term

Definition

Plaintiff or Mattel

Mattel, Inc.

Defendants

Guangzhou Huaweimian Clothing Co., Ltd. d/b/a www.barbiedollhouse.shop; Yicheng County Tengyi Network Sales Co., Ltd. d/b/a www.barbietoy.shop; Li Hao d/b/a www.barbietoy-usa.Shop; Yang Junhui d/b/a www.barbieusa.store; Li Hao; Yang Junhui; www.barbiedollhouse.shop; www.barbietoy.shop; www.barbietoy-usa.shop; www.barbieusa.shop and www.barbieusa.store

Cloudflare

Cloudflare, Inc., with an address of 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, California 94107, and any and all affiliated companies regardless of geographic location, which operate a cloud-based web infrastructure platform, available at www.cloudflare.com, that enables capabilities to host static websites on a content delivery network

NameSilo

NameSilo, LLC, with an address of 8825 N. 23rd Ave Suite 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85021, and any and all affiliated companies, which operate an ICANN accredited domain name registrar and web hosting company, available at www.namesilo.com, that allows consumers to register domain names and create websites

Dynadot

Dynadot, LLC, with an address of 210 S Ellsworth Ave #345 San Mateo, California 94401, and any and all affiliated companies, which operate an ICANN accredited domain name registrar and web hosting company, available at www.dynadot.com, that allows consumers to register domain names and create websites

Epstein Drangel

Epstein Drangel LLP, counsel for Plaintiff

New York Address

244 Madison Ave, Suite 411, New York, NY 10016

Complaint

Plaintiff's instant Complaint

Application

Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for: 1) a temporary restraining order; 2) an order restraining Defendants' Websites (as defined infra) and Defendants' Assets (as defined infra) with the Financial Institutions (as defined infra); 3) an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue; 4) an order authorizing bifurcated and alternative service and 5) an order authorizing expedited discovery

Moore Dec.

Declaration of Michael Moore in Support of Plaintiff's Application

Ioannou Dec.

Declaration of Karena K. Ioannou in Support of Plaintiff's Application

Barbie

An iconic and world-renowned fashion doll

Barbie Products

A vast range of commercial products including dolls, playhouses, toy cars, books, movies, games, puzzles and clothing sold under the Barbie brand

Barbie Marks

U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.: 689, 055 for “BARBIE” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 2, 678, 386 for “BARBIE” for a variety of goods in Classes 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 30; 2, 087, 842 for “BARLIE” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 2, 639, 971 for “BARLIE ” for a variety of goods in Class 25 and 28; 774, 892 for “SKIPPER” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 2, 931, 614 for “CHELSEA” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 3, 083, 593 for “BARBIE COLLECTOR” for a variety of goods in Classes 28 and 41; 3, 189, 837 for “PINK LABEL” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 3, 702, 525 for “FASHIONISTAS” for goods in Class 28; 5, 214, 711 for “YOU CAN BE ANYTHING” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 5, 233, 292 for “BARBIE DREAMTOPIA” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 5, 449, 612 for “BABYSITTERS INC.” for a variety of goods in Class 28; and 6, 097, 805 for “COLOR REVEAL” for a variety of goods in Class 28

Barbie Works

U.S. Copyright Reg. Nos.: VA 2-038-351, covering the 2017 Barbie Packaging Branding for Consumer Products; VA 2-135-686, covering the 2016 Catalog Fall Mattel; and VA 945-179 covering CEO BARBIE

Plaintiff's Website

Barbie's fully interactive website, located at http://www.barbie.mattel.com and Mattel's fully interactive website, located at http://www.mattel.com

Counterfeit Products

Defendants' products advertised, offered for sale and/or sold by Defendants via Defendants' Websites (as defined infra), which use the Barbie Marks and/or Barbie Works and/or products in packaging and/or containing labels bearing the Barbie Marks, and/or Barbie Works, and/or bearing or used in connection with marks and/or artwork that are confusingly or substantially similar to the Barbie Marks, and/or Barbie Works and/or products that are identical or confusingly or substantially similar to the Barbie Products

Defendants' Websites

Any and all fully interactive websites held by or associated with Defendants, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them, that use the Barbie Marks, that they operate to communicate with consumers regarding their Counterfeit Products and/or through which consumers purchase Counterfeit Products for delivery in the U.S., including, without limitation, Defendants' websites located at www.barbiedollhouse.shop, www.barbietoy.shop; www.barbietoy-usa.shop, www.barbieusa.shop and www.barbieusa.store along with any and all of the domain names associated therewith, including the Infringing Domain Names

Infringing Listings

Defendants' listings for Counterfeit Products

Infringing Domain Names

www.barbiedollhouse.shop, www.barbietoy.shop; www.barbietoy-usa.shop, www.barbieusa.shop and www.barbieusa.store

Defendants' Assets

Any and all money, securities or other property or assets of Defendants (whether said assets are located in the U.S. or abroad)

Defendants' Financial Accounts

Any and all financial accounts associated with or utilized by any Defendants or any of Defendants' Websites (whether said accounts are located in the U.S. or abroad)

Financial Institutions

Any banks, financial institutions, credit card companies and payment processing agencies, such as PayPal Inc. (“PayPal”), Payoneer Inc. (“Payoneer”), PingPong Global Solutions, Inc. (“PingPong”) and other companies or agencies that engage in the processing or transfer of money and/or real or personal property of Defendants

Third Party Service Providers

Any third party providing services in connection with Defendants' Counterfeit Products and/or Defendants' Websites, including, without limitation, Internet Service Providers (“ISP”), back-end service providers, web designers, merchant account providers, website hosts such as Cloudflare, domain name registrars, such as Dynadot, domain name registries, shipping, fulfillment and warehousing service providers

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed this case under seal on February 3, 2022 and requested: 1) a temporary restraining order; 2) an order restraining Defendants' Websites and Defendants' Assets with the Financial Institutions; 3) an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue; 4) an order authorizing bifurcated and alternative service; and 5) an order authorizing expedited discovery against Defendants, Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions in light of Defendants' intentional and willful counterfeiting and infringement of the Barbie Marks and Barbie Works (the “Application”).

On February 11, 2022, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiff's Application (the “TRO”) and ordered Defendants to appear on February 25, 2022 at 3:30 p.m. to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue (“Show Cause Hearing”);

Plaintiff has filed certificate of service stating that, pursuant to the alternative methods of service authorized by the TRO, Plaintiff served the Summons, Complaint, TRO and all papers filed in support of the Application on six (6) of Defendants' email addresses (altitude53830044@gmail.com, saydafinlason07@gmail.com, eaajia@163.com, oku125441@163.com, dawang65852@163.com and maroborr@163.com), Plaintiff was unable to serve Defendants' remaining six (6) email addresses (barbiedollhouse.service@gmail.com, barbietoy.service@gmail.com, barbietoy-usa.service@gmail.com, barbieusa.service@gmail.com, customerservice660233@gmail.com and ssjvdxdrlbhmggqwdflez@hotmail.com). Plaintiff's counsel represented that due to the relationship of the Defendants the six email addresses that were served provided service on all Defendants.

Plaintiff appeared at the Order to Show Cause hearing held February 25, 2022 at 3:30 p.m, however, no Defendants appeared.

For the reasons stated on the record at the Show Cause Hearing-namely, that Plaintiff is likely to succeed on one, if not more, of its Lanham Act claims; that Plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, that the balance of equities tip in Plaintiff's favor, and that an injunction furthers the public's interest in not being deceived-the request for a preliminary injunction is granted. It is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The injunctive relief previously granted in the TRO shall remain in place through the pendency of this litigation, and issuing this Order is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and Section 34 of the Lanham Act.

a) Accordingly, Defendants are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions pending the final hearing and determination of this action or until further order of the Court:
i. manufacturing, importing, exporting, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale, selling and/or otherwise dealing in Counterfeit Products, or any other products bearing the Barbie Marks and/or Barbie Works and/or marks and/or artwork that are confusingly and/or substantially similar to, identical to and constitute a counterfeiting or infringement of the Barbie Marks and/or Barbie Works;
ii. directly or indirectly infringing in any manner Plaintiff's Barbie Marks and Barbie Works;
iii. using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of Plaintiff's
Barbie Marks and Barbie Works to identify any goods or services not authorized by Plaintiff;
iv. using Plaintiff's Barbie Marks and Barbie Works and/or any other marks that are confusingly similar to the Barbie Marks and/or any other artwork that is substantially similar to the Barbie Works, on or in connection with Defendants' Websites and/or Defendants' manufacturing, importation, exportation, advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, offering for sale, sale and/or otherwise dealing in Counterfeit Products;
v. using any false designation of origin or false description, or engaging in any action that is likely to cause confusion, cause mistake and/or to deceive members of the trade and/or the public as to the affiliation, connection or association of any product manufactured, imported, exported, advertised, marketed, promoted, distributed, displayed, offered for sale or sold by Defendants with Plaintiff, and/or as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of any product manufactured, imported, exported, advertised, marketed, promoted, distributed, displayed, offered for sale or sold by Defendants, website owned or operated by Defendants, services provided by Defendants and/or Defendants' commercial activities and Plaintiff;
vi. secreting, concealing, destroying, altering, selling off, transferring or otherwise disposing of and/or dealing with: (i) Counterfeit Products and/or (ii) any computer files, data, business records, documents or any other records or evidence relating to their Defendants' Websites, Defendants' Assets and/or the manufacturing, importation, exportation, advertising, marketing, promotion,
distribution, display, offering for sale and/or sale of Counterfeit Products;
vii. effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations, or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth in this Order;
viii. linking, transferring, selling and/or operating Defendants' Websites;
ix. registering, trafficking in or using any domain names that incorporate any of Plaintiff's Barbie Marks and Barbie Works, or any colorable imitation thereof, including the Infringing Domain Names; and
x. knowingly instructing, aiding or abetting any other person or business entity in engaging in any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs 1(a)(i) through 1(a)(ix) above and 1(b)(i) through 1(b)(ii) and 1(c)(i) through I(c)(ii) below.
b) Accordingly, the Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions pending the final hearing and determination of this action or until further order of the Court:
i. secreting, concealing, transferring, disposing of, withdrawing, encumbering or paying Defendants' Assets from or to Defendants' Financial Accounts until further ordered by this Court;
ii. secreting, concealing, destroying, altering, selling off, transferring or otherwise disposing of and/or dealing with any computer files, data, business records, documents or any other records or evidence relating to Defendants' Assets and Defendants' Financial Accounts; and
iii. knowingly instructing any person or business entity to engage in any activities referred to in subparagraphs 1(a)(i) through 1(a)(ix), 1(b)(i) through 1(b)(ii) above and I(c)(i) through I(c)(ii) below.
c) Accordingly, the Third Party Service Providers are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions pending the final hearing and determination of this action or until further order of the Court:
i. providing services to Defendants, including, without limitation, those relating to the continued operation of Defendants' Websites;
ii. permitting the transfer, sale and/or assignment of Defendants' Websites, including the Infringing Domain Names; and
iii. knowingly instructing any other person or business entity to engage in any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs 1(a)(i) through 1(a)(xi), 1(b)(i) through 1(b)(ii) and 1(c)(i) through 1(c)(ii) above.

2. As sufficient cause has been shown, the asset restraint granted in the TRO shall remain in place through the pendency of this litigation, including that:

a) within seven (7) days of receipt of notice of this Order, any newly discovered Financial Institutions who are served with this Order shall locate and attach Defendants' Financial Accounts, shall provide written confirmation of such attachment to Plaintiff's counsel and provide Plaintiff's counsel with a summary report containing account details for any and all such accounts, which shall include, at a minimum, identifying information for Defendants and Defendants' Websites, contact information for Defendants (including mailing addresses and e-mail addresses), account numbers and account balances for any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts.

3. As sufficient cause has been shown, the expedited discovery previously granted in the TRO shall remain in place through the pendency of this litigation, including that:

a) Plaintiff may serve interrogatories pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as Local Civil Rule 33.3 of the Local Rules for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and Defendants who are served with this Order shall provide written responses under oath to such interrogatories within fourteen (14) days of service to Plaintiff's counsel.
b) Plaintiff may serve requests for the production of documents pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Defendants who are served with this Order, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them who receive actual notice of this Order shall produce all documents responsive to such requests within fourteen (14) days of service to Plaintiff's counsel.
c) Within fourteen (14) days after receiving notice of this Order, all Financial Institutions who receive service of this Order shall provide Plaintiff's counsel with all documents and records in their possession, custody or control (whether located in the U.S. or abroad), relating to any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts, including, but not limited to, documents and records relating to:
i. account numbers;
ii. current account balances;
iii. any and all identifying information for Defendants and/or Defendants' Websites including but not limited to, names, addresses and contact information;
iv. any and all account opening documents and records, including, but not limited
to, account applications, signature cards, identification documents, and if a business entity, any and all business documents provided for the opening of each and every of Defendants' Financial Accounts;
v. any and all deposits and withdrawal during the previous year from each and every of Defendants' Financial Accounts and any and all supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, documents sufficient to identify the geographic location(s) of any consumers from which deposits were sent, deposit slips, withdrawal slips, cancelled checks and account statements; and
vi. any and all wire transfers into each and every one of Defendants' Financial Accounts during the previous year, including, but not limited to, documents sufficient to show the identity of the destination of the transferred funds, the geographic location(s) of the transferor(s), the identity of the beneficiary's bank and the beneficiary's account number.
d) Within fourteen (14) days after receiving notice of this Order, the Third Party Service Providers shall prove to Plaintiff's counsel all documents and records in their possession, custody or control (whether located in the U.S. or abroad) relating to Defendants' Websites, including, but not limited to, documents and records relating to:
i. account details, including, without limitation, identifying information and URLs for any and all accounts or websites that Defendants have ever had and/or currently maintain with the Third Party Service Providers that were not previously provided pursuant to Paragraph V(C) of the TRO;
ii. the identities, location and contact information, including any and all e-mail addresses, of Defendants that were not previously provided pursuant to
Paragraph V(C) of the TRO;
iii. the nature of Defendants' businesses and operations, methods of accepting payment and any and all financial information, including, but not limited to, information associated with Defendants' Websites, a full accounting of Defendants' sales history and listing history under such accounts, and Defendants' Financial Accounts with any and all Financial Institutions associated with Defendants' Websites; and
iv. Defendants' manufacturing, importation, exportation, advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, display, offering for sale and/or sale of Counterfeit Products, or any other products bearing the Barbie Marks and/or Barbie Works and/or marks and/or artwork that are confusingly similar to, identical to and constitute an infringement of the Barbie Marks and/or Barbie Works.

4. As sufficient cause has been shown, and pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(3), service may be made on, and shall be deemed effective as to Defendants if it is completed by the following means:

a) An email that includes the case name, number, and attaches a copy of this order, as well as the complaint and supporting materials. The email must also give notice that the recipient is being served a complaint for an action in the Southern District of New York. If the materials are too large to send as an attachment, Plaintiff may use a link to a secure website (including NutStore, a large mail link created through Rmail.com and via website publication through a specific page dedicated to this lawsuit accessible through ipcounselorslawsuit.com) where each Defendant will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order to Defendants' email addresses,
barbiedollhouse.service@gmail.com, barbietoy.service@gmail.com, barbietoy- usa.service@gmail.com, barbieusa.service@gmail.com, customerservice660233@gmail.com, eaajia@163.com, oku125441@163.com, dawang65852@163.com, ssjvdxdrlbhmggqwdflez@hotmail.com, maroborr@163.com, altitude53830044@gmail.com and saydafinlason07@gmail.com.

5. As sufficient cause has been shown, that such alternative service by electronic means ordered in the TRO and herein shall be deemed effective as to Defendants through the pendency of this action.

6. As sufficient cause has been shown, service of this Order shall be made on and deemed effective as to the Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions, including PayPal, Cloudflare, NameSilo and Dynadot - by regular process. In addition to standard service, Plaintiff may also serve the Financial Institutions and Third Party Service Providers by:

a) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, and (ii) a link to a secure website where PayPal will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to PayPal Legal Specialist at EEOMALegalSpecialist@paypal.com;
b) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, and (ii) a link to a secure website where Cloudflare will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to abuse@cloudflare.com;
c) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, and (ii) a link to a secure website where NameSilo will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to support@namesilo.com; and
d) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, and or (ii) a link to a secure website where Dynadot will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to abuse@dynadot.com.

7. The $5,000.00 bond posted by Plaintiff shall remain with the Court until a final disposition of this case or until this Order is terminated.

8. This Order shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, or until further order of the Court.

9. Any Defendants that are subject to this Order may appear and move to dissolve or modify the Order on two (2) days' notice to Plaintiff or on shorter notice as set by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mattel, Inc. v. Guangzhou Huaweimian Clothing Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 1, 2022
22-cv-963 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Mattel, Inc. v. Guangzhou Huaweimian Clothing Co.

Case Details

Full title:MATTEL, INC., Plaintiff v. GUANGZHOU HUAWEIMIAN CLOTHING CO., LTD. d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

22-cv-963 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)