From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matteawan Manufacturing Co. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1936
3 N.E.2d 845 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued April 30, 1936

Decided July 8, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Orison S. Marden and Charles J. Fay for plaintiff; appellant and respondent.

Justus Scheffield, Philip A. Carroll and Jack D. Gunther for Chemical Bank and Trust Company, defendant, respondent and appellant.

Walbridge S. Taft, Malcolm S. Langford and Whitman Knapp for The Midnight Mission, defendant, appellant and respondent.


Judgment modified to the extent that plaintiff's complaint against The Midnight Mission is dismissed, with costs in all courts to The Midnight Mission against the plaintiff, and the judgment otherwise affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against Chemical Bank and Trust Company, and with costs to Chemical Bank and Trust Company against The Midnight Mission. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Matteawan Manufacturing Co. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1936
3 N.E.2d 845 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Matteawan Manufacturing Co. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:MATTEAWAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant and Respondent, v. CHEMICAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 8, 1936

Citations

3 N.E.2d 845 (N.Y. 1936)
3 N.E.2d 845

Citing Cases

Federal Ins. Co. v. Groveland State Bank

The language of the check making the funds payable only upon the order of the defendant imposed upon it the…

Fidelity Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Hellenic Bank Tr. Co.

( Hathaway v. County of Delaware, 185 N.Y. 368, 374.) Hence, the defendant bank could not escape the duty of…