From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matsuura v. Alston Bird

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 2, 1999
179 F.3d 1131 (9th Cir. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 97-16400, 97-17033

Argued and Submitted June 9, 1998 — San Francisco, California.

Filed February 2, 1999 Amended June 25, 1999

COUNSEL

Stephen T. Cox, Molligan, Cox Moyer, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

William H. Boice and A. Stephens Clay, Kilpatrick Stockon, Atlanta, Georgia, for the defendant-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, David Alan Ezra, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CR-96-01180 DAE.

Before: James R. Browning, Alfred T. Goodwin, and Mary M. Schroeder, Circuit Judges.


The opinion filed February 2, 1999, is modified as follows:

Section II, second paragraph, first and second sentences: delete first sentence and add the following footnote to end of the second sentence:

[FN] DuPont makes a bare assertion in a footnote that DiSabatino was wrongly decided, but devotes its argument to distinguishing the case.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The request for certification and the motion for a stay of proceedings are denied.


Summaries of

Matsuura v. Alston Bird

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 2, 1999
179 F.3d 1131 (9th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

Matsuura v. Alston Bird

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MATSUURA, individually and dba Orchid Isle Nursery, and STEPHEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 2, 1999

Citations

179 F.3d 1131 (9th Cir. 1999)