From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matson Navigation Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. CV 11 3571 1b (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11 3571 1b

10-11-2011

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD D. SHIVELY Richard D. Shively Attorneys for Petitioner MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC. CHRISTENSEN LAW GROUP Kevin M.(Casey) Christensen Attorneys for Respondent ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY


Kevin M.(Casey) Christensen (Bar No. 168119)

CHRISTENSEN LAW GROUP

Attorneys for Respondent

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE

COMPANY

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING

DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

ARBITRATOR [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6

2(a)]

The parties, through undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. The dispute that is the subject of this lawsuit is subject to binding arbitration pursuant to prior agreement of the parties. On August 19, 2011, the parties stipulated to extend St. Paul's time to respond to Matson's Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator (the "Petition"), to and including September 16, 2011.

2. On September 15, 2011, the parties reached preliminary agreement on an umpire, Hon. Charles Legge (Ret.). The parties have or shortly will confirm with Judge Legge that he is willing to serve in that capacity. Assuming he is, his appointment would render the Petition moot.

3. In order to confirm Judge Legge's appointment, to minimize inconvenience to the Court, and to avoid unnecessary expense by the parties, the parties agree that the hearing on the Petition, and all corresponding briefing not yet filed by the parties, should be continued to the first available date on the Court's calendar after November 15, 2011. If, as is expected, the parties are able to confirm Judge Legge's appointment in the interim, the Petition will be dismissed by stipulation. If not, the parties will brief and present the Petition to the Court for hearing according to the new hearing date.

4. By virtue of the foregoing, the parties respectfully submit that good cause exists, and respectfully request the Court, to continue the hearing on the Petition and all corresponding briefing deadlines to a date not earlier than November 15, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD D. SHIVELY

Richard D. Shively

Attorneys for Petitioner

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC.

CHRISTENSEN LAW GROUP

Kevin M.(Casey) Christensen

Attorneys for Respondent

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE

COMPANY

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Laurel Beeler

United States Magistrate Judge

Northern District of California

Plaintiff's petition (ECF No. 1) shall be heard by the court on Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. Defendant shall file any opposition brief no later than December 8, 2011. Plaintiff shall file any reply brief no later than December 15, 2011.


Summaries of

Matson Navigation Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. CV 11 3571 1b (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Matson Navigation Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE…

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11 3571 1b (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)