From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matrisciano v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1999
263 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 27, 1999

July 12, 1999

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated July 6, 1998, which granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211.

William D. Friedman, Hempstead, N.Y., for appellant.

Ingerman Smith, LLP, Northport, N.Y. (Anna M. Scricca of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, HOWARD MILLER, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211. To the extent that the plaintiff sought reinstatement with back pay to her position as a school bus driver based upon alleged violations of her contractual rights, her failure to file a notice of claim is fatal to her case ( see, Matter of Stevens v. Board of Educ., McGraw Cent. School Dist., 261 A.D.2d 698 [3d Dept., May 6, 1999]; Matter of Sainato v. Western Suffolk BOCES, 242 A.D.2d 301; Matter of McClellan v. Alexander Cent. School Bd. of Educ., 201 A.D.2d 898). In any event, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the collective bargaining agreement did not require that the plaintiff be given notice of charges and a hearing, and therefore there was no contractual violation ( see, Matter of Montero v. Lum, 68 N.Y.2d 253, 257, n 3; Matter of Robbins v. Malone Cent. School Dist., 182 A.D.2d 890).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit ( see, Matter of Voorhis v. Warwick Val. Cent. School Dist., 92 A.D.2d 571; see also, Matter of Lutwin v. Alleyne, 58 N.Y.2d 889; Brandt v. BOCES, 820 F.2d 41, 43).


Summaries of

Matrisciano v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1999
263 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matrisciano v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:CATHY MATRISCIANO, appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 729

Citing Cases

Whalen v. Reisman

Town Law § 65(3) provides that no action upon or arising from a contract may be brought against a town,…

Mcgovern v. Mount Pleasant Cent. Sch. Dist.

.3d 766, 767–768, 941 N.Y.S.2d 265), or commences a proceeding to vindicate a public interest ( see Doyle v.…