From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matos v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-295 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-295 Erie.

February 7, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 6, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9], filed on January 20, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition [Doc. No. 1] be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Petition [Doc. No. 1] is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on January 20, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Matos v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-295 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Matos v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:PABLO MATOS, Petitioner, v. JAMES F. SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 7, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-295 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2006)