From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matos v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Cnty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 25, 2012
35 A.3d 1214 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

No. 125 EM 2011.

2012-01-25

Jose MATOS, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests extraordinary relief, it is DENIED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests mandamus relief, it is GRANTED. The Post Conviction Relief Act court is directed to provide Petitioner with court-appointed counsel, if warranted, within 60 days of this order. Additionally, the lower court is directed to dispose of the pending petition expeditiously.


Summaries of

Matos v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Cnty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 25, 2012
35 A.3d 1214 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Matos v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Jose MATOS, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

35 A.3d 1214 (Pa. 2012)