From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matlow v. Content IQ, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 19, 2021
20-CV-8413 (LAK) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-8413 (LAK) (BCM)

11-19-2021

LINDA M MATLOW, Plaintiff, v. CONTENT IQ, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING GENERAL PRETRIAL MANAGEMENT

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.

The above-referenced action has been referred to Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses for general pretrial management, including scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement, and for report and recommendation on dispositive motions, if any, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B). All pretrial motions and applications, including those related to scheduling and discovery must be made to Judge Moses and in compliance with this Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, available on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-barbara-moses. Parties and counsel are cautioned:

1. All discovery must be initiated in time to be concluded by the close of discovery set by the Court.
2. Discovery applications, including letter-motions requesting discovery conferences, must be made promptly after the need for such an application arises and must comply with Local Civil Rule 37.2 and § 2(b) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices. It is the Court's practice to decide discovery disputes at the Rule 37.2 conference, based on the parties' letters, unless the Court determines that more formal briefing is required. Absent extraordinary circumstances, discovery applications made later than 30 days prior to the close of discovery may be denied as untimely.
3. For motions other than discovery motions, pre-motion conferences are not required, but may be requested where counsel believe that an informal conference with the Court
may obviate the need for a motion or narrow the issues.
4. Requests to adjourn a court conference or other court proceeding (including a telephonic court conference) or to extend a deadline must be made in writing and in compliance with § 2(a) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices. Telephone requests for adjournments or extensions will not be entertained.
5. In accordance with § 1(d) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices, letters and letter-motions are limited to four pages, exclusive of attachments. Courtesy copies of letters and letter-motions filed via ECF are required only if the filing contains attachments, which must be attached with protruding tabs.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Matlow v. Content IQ, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 19, 2021
20-CV-8413 (LAK) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Matlow v. Content IQ, LLC

Case Details

Full title:LINDA M MATLOW, Plaintiff, v. CONTENT IQ, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

20-CV-8413 (LAK) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2021)