From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matlock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 24, 1993
859 S.W.2d 275 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63088.

August 24, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, SCOTLAND COUNTY, E. RICHARD WEBER, J.

Lew Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant-movant.

Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City for plaintiff-respondent.


Movant, Steven Ralph Matlock, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Movant was sentenced to imprisonment on his pleas of guilty to three felonies. He was delivered to the department of corrections on June 11, 1991. He did not file his Rule 24.035 motion until February 18, 1992.

Rule 24.035(b) provides that the motion shall be filed within ninety days after the movant is delivered to the department of corrections. Movant therefore had until September 10, 1991 to file his motion. Failure to do so constituted a complete waiver of any right to proceed under his motion for postconviction relief. Rule 24.035(b), Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 694 (Mo. banc 1989).

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed.

REINHARD and CRIST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matlock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 24, 1993
859 S.W.2d 275 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Matlock v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN RALPH MATLOCK, DEFENDANT-MOVANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Aug 24, 1993

Citations

859 S.W.2d 275 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Leatherwood v. State

Because Defendant filed no motion for postconviction relief within ninety days after delivery to the…

Brown v. State

Rule 24.035(a). See alsoLeatherwood v. State , 898 S.W.2d 109, 111 (Mo.App.S.D. 1995); Matlock v. State , 859…