From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matlock v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3049-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3049-JAM-CMK-P.

January 26, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 apparently challenging the denial of parole in July 2009. For the reasons discussed in findings and recommendations issued separately, the court finds it appropriate to vacate the December 30, 2010, order directing respondent to respond to the amended petition. Respondent is relieved of any obligation to respond to the amended petition unless ordered otherwise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 25, 2011


Summaries of

Matlock v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3049-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Matlock v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STEPHEN MATLOCK, Petitioner, v. MIKE MARTEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3049-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)