From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matlock-Bey v. Ringwood

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Jun 1, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-00087-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jun. 1, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-00087-SWW-JJV.

June 1, 2010


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

Mailings to plaintiff have repeatedly been returned to the Court as undeliverable.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Matlock-Bey v. Ringwood

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Jun 1, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-00087-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jun. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Matlock-Bey v. Ringwood

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN MATLOCK-BEY, Reg. #07225-025 Plaintiff, v. RINGWOOD, Director, FC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-00087-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jun. 1, 2010)