From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matkoskey v. Somerset Cnty.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 20, 2022
3:19-cv-66-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 20, 2022)

Opinion

3:19-cv-66-KAP

05-20-2022

DARIN LEE MATKOSKEY, Plaintiff, v. SOMERSET COUNTY, et al. Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

The remaining defendants filed a motion to compel, ECF no. 32. Plaintiff has not opposed it. The motion is therefore granted. Plaintiff shall answer the defendants' discovery requests within two weeks, and all current pretrial deadlines are pushed back one month. Plaintiff is advised that he has to cooperate with discovery requests or assert proper objections to them: simply ignoring discovery requests can lead to the exclusion of evidence, the dismissal of claims, or in extreme cases the entry of judgment against an offending party.

Notice by ECF to counsel of record and by U.S. Mail to:

Darin Lee Matkoskey


Summaries of

Matkoskey v. Somerset Cnty.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 20, 2022
3:19-cv-66-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Matkoskey v. Somerset Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:DARIN LEE MATKOSKEY, Plaintiff, v. SOMERSET COUNTY, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 20, 2022

Citations

3:19-cv-66-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 20, 2022)