From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matice v. Underwood

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 29, 2021
Civil Action 3:19-CV-300-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:19-CV-300-S-BH

11-29-2021

ROGER DEAN MATICE, ID No. 47448-379 v. M. UNDERWOOD, Warden


ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 11. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, Petitioner's Motion for Award of Good Time Under Title 28 USC §2241 [ECF No. 3] is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

A certificate of appealability is not required for a federal inmate to appeal the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Matice v. Underwood

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 29, 2021
Civil Action 3:19-CV-300-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Matice v. Underwood

Case Details

Full title:ROGER DEAN MATICE, ID No. 47448-379 v. M. UNDERWOOD, Warden

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 3:19-CV-300-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2021)