From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathisen v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Nov 13, 2013
CASE NO. C13-1040-RSL-MAT (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-1040-RSL-MAT

11-13-2013

BARBARA E. MATHISEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brought this action to seek judicial review of the denial of her application for disability benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The parties now stipulate this case should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. (Dkt. 16.)

Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court recommends this case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge shall: (1) offer plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing, further update the medical record, and issue a new decision; (2) include all unrejected work-related limitations in the residual functional capacity (RFC) finding; (3) further consider plaintiff's ability to return to past relevant work at step four in accordance with Social Security Ruling (SSR) 82-62 and obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence in order to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on plaintiff's occupational base, including whether she had transferable skills and the type of skills acquired from any past relevant work in accordance with SSR 82-41; and (4) if necessary, reassess step five with the assistance of a vocational expert, ensuring the vocational expert is provided a hypothetical consistent with the RFC ultimately found. Upon proper application, the Court will consider plaintiff's application for attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412, et seq.

The Court recommends that United States District Judge Robert S. Lasnik immediately approve this Report and Recommendation and order the case REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

____________

Mary Alice Theiler

Chief United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Mathisen v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Nov 13, 2013
CASE NO. C13-1040-RSL-MAT (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Mathisen v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA E. MATHISEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C13-1040-RSL-MAT (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2013)