From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathis v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jan 19, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05CV44 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:04CR27 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 19, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05CV44 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:04CR27.

January 19, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On this day the above styled case came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert, filed August 30, 2006, and the Petitioner's objections thereto filed on September 22, 2006. The Court notes that Petitioner's objections were not timely filed. However, in the interests of justice and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has conducted a de novo review.

The Court, after reviewing the above, is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ORDERED adopted. Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation restate his underlying claims. Specifically, the Petitioner argues that the Court's consideration of relevant conduct in calculating his sentence constitutes a constitutional violation. As stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Defendant was sentenced well below the statutory maximum. The Statutory maximum is based upon the drug weight charged in the indictment and admitted by the Petitioner in his guilty plea. Since the Courts consideration of relevant conduct in determining its sentence did not increase the penalty beyond the prescribed statutory maximum, consideration of such relevant conduct is permitted. See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000).

The Court, therefore, ORDERS that the petitioner's § 2255 motion (Document No. 1) be DENIED. Petitioner's Motion to Remand (Document No. 4) is DENIED. The Court further notes and affirms that Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Document No. 3) was DENIED in Magistrate Seibert's Report and Recommendation. It is further ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit true copies of this Order to the Petitioner and all counsel of record herein.


Summaries of

Mathis v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jan 19, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05CV44 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:04CR27 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Mathis v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER MATHIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Jan 19, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05CV44 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:04CR27 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 19, 2007)