Opinion
Nos. 05-08-00970-CR, 05-08-00971-CR
Opinion filed August 8, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F02-22877-K, F03-23495-K.
Before Justices MORRIS, WHITTINGTON, and O'NEILL.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mary Mathis appealed the trial court's order denying her motion to recuse. An order denying a motion to recuse is not an appealable interlocutory order.See generally Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant has appeals from the judgments of conviction in the above trial court numbers pending as cause nos. 05-08-00869-CR and 05-08-00870-CR. Those appeals have been abated for findings regarding the record. It appears appellant's motion to recuse may be related to the abatement order.